Thursday, January 12, 2012

What Kind of Camera Should My Wedding Photographer Use?

!±8± What Kind of Camera Should My Wedding Photographer Use?

If you are in the process of looking for a wedding photographer, chances are you will soon hear the terms: medium format, 35mm, and digital. Those are the three customary types of camera systems currently used by wedding photographers. We, the wedding photographers, have argued among ourselves for years as to which camera theory is best. I'll start by sharing with you about the distinct camera systems and will then give you my concept of which camera theory your wedding photographer should use.

Medium Format

For many years medium format has been the absolute best option. A medium format camera uses film that is 3 times the size of a 35mm negative-- resulting in higher resolution images and gorgeous enlargements, however, the cameras and processing costs are very expensive.

Primary advantages: high resolution negatives. Previously, the fact that a man owned a Medium Format camera was almost, in and of itself, a sign that they were a true "wedding photographer" (due to the cost of the system).

Disadvantages: high-priced to control (film costs are so high that some wedding photography books encourage medium format photographers to limit the photos they take); film can be lost or damaged during processing; slower to focus and operate.

35mm

For many years 35mm has had a bad prestige for providing poor potential enlargements -- especially when compared to medium format. However, over the past 10 years the potential of 35mm film has improved tremendously. It is now a coarse format used by many professional photographers, especially those who use the photojournalistic style and shoot close to a thousand or more images on a wedding day.

Primary advantages to 35mm: fast (easy to swiftly focus and shoot during), much improved potential of enlargements (many habitancy would have a hard time telling the inequity between a 35mm and medium format 8x10 enlargement).

Disadvantages: processing film is becoming more and more expensive, and film can be damaged or loss during processing. Many photographers that shoot film are now having the negatives scanned so that the files become a digital file.

Digital

Professional digital wedding photography has been a viable choice since about the year 2000 (although some would argue that date). The potential of digital cameras has now reached a point where I now feel digital has surpassed the potential of medium format negatives. Keep in mind there is a broad variety of cameras, and a "professional" digital camera from 2004 that cost ,500 new will not capture the potential of images that a "pro-am" (a camera targeted to industrialized amateurs and also professionals) from 2010 that costs ,000 will capture. "Digital camera" covers a massive spectrum of cameras and camera quality.

Primary digital advantages: instant divulge of images on the back of the camera; no film and processing costs (although the savings is offset by the further computer time required to process the digital images); more control over the images (i.e., a miniature rotation or cropping of an image is quick and easy with digital but requires a practice print from 35mm or medium format). Many digital cameras surpass the potential of even medium format.

Disadvantages: technology changes rapidly over time and cameras soon are outdated (although this doesn't necessarily effect you, as the consumer). Memory cards are easier to lose than rolls of film (if your wedding photographer uses a digital camera, ask them how they make sure the photos arrive safely back at the studio).

So, which camera theory should my photographer use?

No matter what you have been told - all three formats are a viable recipe for wedding photography. Some might be more high-priced than others, but they all Can produce good results. The fact is that all three systems can effect in poor-quality photos, too. Many photographers use several of the camera systems. Some might use medium format for the formals but 35mm for the reception and ceremony coverage. Others will primarily shoot digital, but might bring film cameras as backup equipment.

This is the key: before signing a ageement with a photographer, ask to see sample enlargements that were taken with the same tool that would be used at your wedding. If you like the potential and color of the images, it doesn't really matter either 35mm, digital, or a medium format camera was used to description the image!


What Kind of Camera Should My Wedding Photographer Use?

History Of Lava Lamps Compare Desktop Pc Ratings Save You Money!

Friday, January 6, 2012

Top Camera Brands - Shopping Guide

!±8± Top Camera Brands - Shopping Guide

Looking among the top camera brands and can't decide which one to choose? Maybe this article can help you there. For example, choosing between a Canon and a Kodak camera might seem difficult because they're both well known manufacturers. If you want to do stage photography, you should probably go with Kodak cameras, but if you need pictures during sporting events or outdoors, Canon might be a better choice for you. There are a lot more Kodak digital cameras sold every year, but the cameras of choice for professional photographers are either Canons or Nikon.

A little known fact among consumers is that Canon cameras will always be better than Kodaks. As a former sales person in the camera business, I can tell you that Kodak cameras have a bigger rate of returns than Canon models do, and they also feel a bit cheap when you look at them closely. On the other hand, when you use a Canon, you never get that cheap feeling and the return rate is very small. Not to mention the better features that come with their digital cameras. Both my parents and a good friend of mine chose Canon cameras based on my advice and they absolutely love it and they're happy with their choice. If you think about it, there really isn't a competition. It's enough to take a look at the cameras used by professionals. They know what they're doing, and if they're spending their money on Canon digital cameras, so should you. And, it's better to buy a cheaper and older model from Canon than to spend your money on a new Kodak, since chances are that the Canon will still have better features.

If you're not convinced with Canon, go with Nikon digital cameras, but avoid Kodak since there are much better brands out there. However, if you can, pick Canon. You can adapt any kit lens to a Canon camera, even if it wasn't designed for them.

Consider all the experience that Canon has with providing digital SLR cameras for professional photographers and think how easy it is for them to adapt the latest technologies and bring them to digital cameras made especially for regular consumers.

Whenever you choose a digital camera, don't look just at the name of the manufacturer. Make sure you check the online reviews and you learn what each features does, so you make conscious decisions. Spending a few hundred dollars on a camera is not a joke so it shouldn't be a spur of the moment decision.


Top Camera Brands - Shopping Guide

Oakley Probation Decide Now Prices Battle Beyblades Roasting Coffee Machine Reviews


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。